Landed Editorial
Career Advice Team ·
If you have ever applied for a job online and heard nothing back, there is a good chance an applicant tracking system rejected your CV before a human ever read it. Understanding what an ATS is — and how it works — is the single most important piece of knowledge a job seeker can have in 2026.
An applicant tracking system (ATS) is software that companies use to collect, organise, and filter job applications. When you submit your CV through an online job portal, it typically goes straight into an ATS database rather than directly to a recruiter. The system parses your CV, extracts information, and ranks or filters it based on how well it matches the job description.
Popular ATS platforms include Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, iCIMS, Taleo, and Jobvite. According to Jobscan's research, 98% of Fortune 500 companies and 78% of small-to-medium businesses now use an ATS for recruitment.
The process happens in three stages:
When your CV is uploaded, the ATS parses it — breaking the document into structured data. It tries to identify your name, contact details, work history, education, and skills. This is where formatting problems cause the most damage: tables, columns, headers, footers, and graphics can confuse the parser and cause data to be read incorrectly or lost entirely.
Once parsed, your information is stored in the ATS database. Recruiters can then search this database using filters and keywords. If your CV does not contain the right terms, it simply does not appear in their search results — even if you are highly qualified.
Modern ATS platforms score CVs based on keyword match, skills alignment, and other criteria. Some automatically reject CVs below a certain score. Others surface the highest-scoring CVs at the top of a recruiter's queue. Either way, CVs that do not match the job description closely enough are deprioritised or never seen.
Different systems prioritise different signals, but most ATS platforms analyse:
The most common reason is keyword mismatch. Candidates use different terminology than the job description — even when they have the right experience. A project manager who writes "cross-team coordination" may be rejected by an ATS looking for "cross-functional collaboration." The skills are identical; the words are different.
The second most common reason is formatting. CVs designed to look impressive to human eyes — with multiple columns, tables, infographics, and custom fonts — are frequently mangled by ATS parsers. Data ends up in the wrong fields, or disappears entirely.
There are three principles:
Platforms like Landed automate the tailoring step — you paste the job description and the AI rewrites your CV to match it, ensuring keyword alignment across every section without keyword stuffing.
It is worth noting that ATS is a filter, not the final decision maker. If your CV passes the ATS, a human recruiter still reviews it. This means your CV needs to work on two levels: it must satisfy the algorithm and impress a person. A CV stuffed with keywords but written poorly will pass the ATS and fail with the recruiter.
The goal is a CV that reads naturally for humans and is precisely optimised for the ATS — both requirements are met by the same discipline: clear writing, relevant content, and language that mirrors the job description.
An ATS is not an adversary — it is a tool that rewards preparation. Candidates who understand how it works and tailor their CVs accordingly consistently outperform those who do not. In a market where most jobs receive hundreds of applications, ATS optimisation is the baseline, not the ceiling.
Ready to put these tips into practice?
Start my CV freeResume advice, interview prep, and job search strategies. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.