Landed vs Jobscan: ATS Optimisation Head to Head

Jobscan and Landed both aim to help candidates beat ATS filters, but they approach the problem differently. Jobscan analyses your existing CV against a job description and provides a match score with recommendations. Landed analyses the job description and generates a fully tailored CV. Understanding this distinction is key to choosing the right tool.

Overview

Jobscan is primarily an ATS scanning and analysis tool. You upload your CV and paste a job description, and the platform calculates a match percentage, identifies missing keywords, and provides specific recommendations for improvement. It has been a market leader in ATS analysis since its founding.

Landed is an AI-powered CV tailoring platform. Rather than analysing and advising, it performs the tailoring itself — rewriting your content to match the job description and producing a ready-to-submit document.

Scanning vs rewriting

This is the fundamental difference. Jobscan tells you what to fix; Landed fixes it. Jobscan's analysis is detailed and actionable, showing keyword matches, missing skills, and formatting issues. But you then need to manually edit your CV to address each recommendation.

Landed skips the intermediary step. The AI reads the job description, identifies what matters, and rewrites your CV accordingly. The output is a complete, optimised document. For candidates who struggle with writing or simply want to save time, this automated approach eliminates the gap between analysis and action.

Match scoring

Jobscan's match score is one of its most valuable features. The percentage-based score with a detailed breakdown gives you clear, quantifiable feedback on how well your CV aligns with a posting. You can iteratively improve your score by making changes and rescanning.

Landed does not provide a pre-tailoring match score in the same way. Instead, it optimises the match as part of the generation process. The assumption is that the tailored output is already maximally aligned — you do not need to iterate because the AI has done the optimisation.

ATS compatibility features

Jobscan includes specific ATS compatibility checks, identifying formatting issues that might cause parsing problems. It can simulate how different ATS platforms would read your document. Landed addresses ATS compatibility through its template system — the output is generated using templates specifically designed to parse cleanly across all major ATS platforms.

LinkedIn and cover letter tools

Jobscan has expanded to include a LinkedIn optimisation tool and a cover letter analysis feature, both using the same scanning approach. Landed generates tailored cover letters alongside the CV, matched to the same job description. Both platforms recognise that the CV is only one piece of the application puzzle.

Pricing

Jobscan offers a free tier with a limited number of scans per month. Paid plans increase the scan limit and unlock additional features like LinkedIn analysis and power edits. Landed's pricing is structured around the number of tailored CVs generated, reflecting the greater computational cost of AI-powered rewriting.

Which should you choose?

• Choose Jobscan if: you want detailed diagnostic feedback on your CV, prefer to make changes yourself, and value the iterative scan-edit-rescan workflow.
• Choose Landed if: you want automated end-to-end tailoring, prefer a finished document over a set of recommendations, and value speed across multiple applications.

The bottom line

Jobscan is a diagnostic tool — think of it as a CV health check. Landed is a production tool — think of it as a CV factory. Both are effective, but they serve different needs. Jobscan excels at helping you understand how ATS systems see your CV. Landed excels at producing CVs that ATS systems will rank highly without requiring manual intervention.